Effect of- Islamic motif sizes and filament types- for 3D printing fabrics on drapeability properties

Khafagi, Mohamed; Madian, Wedian; EL-Kholy, Ghada

doi:10.21608/jsos.2021.77107.1018

Effect of- Islamic motif sizes and filament types- for 3D printing fabrics on drapeability properties

Document Type : scientific articles

Authors

¹ Department of apparel design and technology Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University Cairo ,Egypt

² Apparel Design and Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University cairo ,Egypt

³ Apparel Design and Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University cairo ,egypt

10.21608/jsos.2021.77107.1018

Abstract

This study focuses on the great development in 3D printing materials and the possibility of using them in fabrics that can be employed in the field of fashion, which leads to the search for the effectiveness of these materials in terms of function. This research examines the drape ability of materials created by 3D printing with TPU filament with varying degrees of elasticity, and comes to work and benefit from previous experiences in this field and the search for its applicability to suit the functional aspect of fashion, which gives the ease of movement of the body, and thus feel comfortable.
the motifs used is inspired by Islamic art with varying sizes on tulle in order to know the material with the highest drape ability based on the size of units and the type of filaments used in 3D printing.
During the research 6 materials were created using the difference of size, TPU filament, and inspired by Islamic motif which were printed using 3D printing techniques which were printed at the Kyoto Design Lab, Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT), Japan.

Keywords

References

Sources and references:
1. Bandyopadhyay, A. and Bose, S. eds., 2019. Additive manufacturing. CRC press.
2. Chiulan, I., Frone, A.N., Brandabur, C. and Panaitescu, D.M., 2018. Recent advances in 3D printing of aliphatic polyesters. Bioengineering, 5(1), p.2.
3. Ćwikła, G., Grabowik, C., Kalinowski, K., Paprocka, I. and Ociepka, P., 2017, August. The influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering (Vol. 227, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing.
4. Fischer, F., 2011. Thermoplastics: the best choice for 3D printing. White Paper, Stratasys Inc., Edn Prairie, MN.
5. France, A.K., 2013. Make: 3D printing: the essential guide to 3D printers. Maker Media, Inc..
6. Gkartzou, E., Koumoulos, E.P. and Charitidis, C.A., 2017. Production and 3D printing processing of bio-based thermoplastic filament. Manufacturing Review, 4, p.1.
7. Godoi, F.C., Prakash, S. and Bhandari, B.R., 2016. 3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects. Journal of Food Engineering, 179, pp.44-54.
8. Johansson, F., 2016. Optimizing Fused Filament Fabrication 3D printing for durability: Tensile properties and layer bonding.
9. Khosravani, M.R. and Reinicke, T., 2020. On the environmental impacts of 3D printing technology. Applied Materials Today, 20, p.100689.
  1. Lin, L., Fang, Y., Liao, Y., Chen, G., Gao, C. and Zhu, P., 2019. 3D printing and digital processing techniques in dentistry: A review of literature. Advanced Engineering Materials, 21(6), p.1801013.
  2. Liu, J., Sun, L., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Yu, S. and Sun, J., 2019. Current advances and future perspectives of 3D printing natural-derived biopolymers. Carbohydrate polymers, 207, pp.297-316.
  3. MacDonald, E. and Wicker, R., 2016. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science, 353(6307).
  4. Munteanu, S.B. and Vasile, C., 2020. Vegetable additives in food packaging polymeric materials. Polymers, 12(1), p.28.
  5. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T. and Hui, D., 2018. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, pp.172-196.
  6. Pichaiyut, S., Nakason, C. and Vennemann, N., 2012. Thermoplastic elastomers-based natural rubber and thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Iranian Polymer Journal, 21(1), pp.65-79.
  7. Prasad, A. and Kandasubramanian, B., 2019. Fused deposition processing polycaprolactone of composites for biomedical applications. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials, 58(13), pp.1365-1398.
  8. Reymond, D. and Dematraz, J., 2014. Using networks in patent exploration: application in patent analysis: the democratization of 3D printing. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 19(40), pp.117-144.
  9. Stansbury, J.W. and Idacavage, M.J., 2016. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dental materials, 32(1), pp.54-64.
  10. Tan, L.J., Zhu, W. and Zhou, K., 2020. Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(43), p.2003062.
  11. Tidd, J. and Bessant, J.R., 2020. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Wittbrodt, B. and Pearce, J.M., 2015. The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Additive Manufacturing, 8, pp.110-116.